Introduction To Leadership Following And Communication Management Essay

Introduction To lead Following And Communication worry EssayIntroduction to LeadershipLeadership is a very serious interpersonal behavior that a managerial position employee or employer should tolerate. What is aimers anyway? The definition of drawship isLeadership is a process whereby an separate influences a grouping of individuals to achieve a common finale.Northo use up (2007, p3)There argon four main factors in attractership which pass on greatly partake the quality of an individual to be a leaderLeaderAs a leader, he must be fitted to gain the deposit from the pursual, as nobody else will determine whether the leader is self-made or non. In order to gain trust from them, the leader must study a good understanding on who he is, what he fill out and what he stooge do. If he failed to be honest to himself, the followers will lack of confidence on him and left uninspired.FollowersFor a successful leader, he must do his work and know the nature of his all(prenom inal) single follower. By doing this, he will be able to see a good understanding of the followers nature, indigences, emotions and motivation, as the followers extend an important role of getting the job done.CommunicationAlways lead through two-way communication. Feedback will be useful when collecting info and information needed for making decisions. Besides, while receiving feedback or suggestions from the followers, the leader commode know what the followers needs and problem. At the same period, it is overly take on an act of concerning the welf ar of the followers.SituationEvery situation that a leader had faced before might be different with around other. Therefore, whenever a b atomic number 18-ass situation happens, a leader must observe carefully and use his judgment to decide the best way of solving the situation or else the problem will be soundless existing and causing to a greater extent problems.Question AAccording to Weber (1947), charisma is described as a certain quality of an individual spirit, by virtue of which s/he is set apart from the customary people and treated as endowed with supernatural, superhuman, or at least specifically, exceptional power or qualities. These are such as are non accessible to the ordinary person, plainly are regarded as of divine origin or as exemplary, and on the basis of them the individual concerned is treated as a leader. Such leaders have a very charming, persuasive disposition about them, whom are skilled at communicating with others and outhouse be very convincing at times.Many leaders are looked on as born naturally with charisma, but it does not mean it cannot be acquired. personal appeal is often considered as to be a trait, an internal fibre which is acquired. However, charisma is an exception, as it is inborn in everyone but at different quantities. But this does not mean the level of inborn charisma is tranquil throughout our lifetime. Developing other characters such as commu nication and affectionate skills whitethorn further enhance ones charisma levels. Charisma also depends on people perception. A person is sole(prenominal) charismatic if people have he or she is charismatic. So, charisma can be acquired.Charisma is not a mandatory requirement to be an powerful leader. Many valet de chambre leaders today do not possess much of charisma, but nonetheless, remain as leaders of their nations. Other factors such as creative thinking and innovation can drive a leader towards effectiveness. Trust is another factor that can be forged between a leader and follower which leads to a much effective lead, with the absence of any charisma. Charisma can be considered as an additional boost but not a requirement to become an effective leader as they may have other leadership qualities. Even without charisma, one can still be an effective leader.Question BCharismatic leadership is not the same as transformational leadership. Both of the leadership have a dif ferent concept from each other.Charismatic leadership can be specify as people with a great confidence in themselves, having a clear romance of their actions and most importantly, they have their own individual charm, personality or influence over the confederation. Charismatic leaders are able to know the needs of their supporters. Therefore they can create a vision that will allow everyone to know future will be modify (Awan, 2010). Martin Luther King, Jr. is a good example of a charismatic leader. He is able to include a vision of colour blind society within the Americans value. He inspired the Americans to accept Afro-Americans in the country and pretend equal treatment to them.On the other hand, transformational leadership is a leadership that helps subordinates to improve themselves and create a better vision for them so that they can become a leader as well. Transformational leaders cogitate more on motivations, inspirations and encouragements. Besides that, they have g ood communication skills which allow them to frame of reference good relationship with others (Kurnik, 2010). They also appreciate their subordinates efforts, ideas and contributions so that they will unfold to work harder. bingle good example of a transformational leader is Abraham Lincoln. He is one of the greatest presidents of The United States. He had a vision for the country, which is adopt the country into a successful country. Sometimes he visited his front lines array to encourage and motivate them so that they do not lose their spirit.Transformational leadership and transactional leadership are both different types of leadership. In transformational leadership, subordinates are judge to achieve higher(prenominal) than their original goals. However, in transactional leadership, subordinates are motivated at a normal standard level. Transactional leaders also relate rewards that are desired by subordinates with the goals and achievements. Besides that, transactional le aders only provide inevitable resources to their subordinates and clarify their expectations. They will only monitor their subordinates from aside but only involved when the performances standard is not met. Other than that, transformational leaders focused on the ends while transactional leaders negotiated over the means (Sir MacGregor Burns, 1978), which means transactional leaders focus on the whole process while transformational only focus on the achievements or results.Question CCulture is briefly described as the group norms, beliefs and determine that makes an administrational unique and also, defines its nature of business organization. Organizational culture, referred as corporate culture in some organization is the system consisting of dual-lane actions, formal rituals, procedures and protocol, values that develops in the organization to act as management on how the members should behave.Strong culture refers to an organization that has a deeply divided up value syst em and the norms and beliefs are followed by the members without fail. As a result, it leads to higher level of business performance. cosmos able to understand one another, they are able to synchronize, improving their efficiency and effectiveness without wasting the organizations time and resources. In addition to that, a stable social system is developed and the need for bureaucratic controls is reduced.Organizational culture would also bar the business progression of an organization, as Fons Trompenaars 1 stated that culture is the way in which a group of people solves problems. Thus, choices to solve the problems and how may vary as the cultures vary in different organizations. Rather, they would agree on other peoples idea but their own.As stated by Bruce M. Tharp, there are four types of organizational cultures that forget business progress. They consist of control, compete, collaborate, and create.Firstly, control or hierarchy culture is the rules and procedures that con tract the members to perform their tasks and control their behavior. Strong culture would impede business progress, because members would not respond to any changes in the organization as they adjusted to the divided value system. For example, members of the organization are always pass awayn otiose time to prepare for incoming projects but the new rule (change) enforced states that the extra time is unnecessary and members have to start the projects as soon as they receive them.Next is compete, otherwise referred to as market culture. Fierce challenger from other organizations is also another factor, making it harder for the organization to achieve its goal and success in the market. The organization has to be both efficient and effective to provide a strong competition. However, strong culture impedes faster development and improvement to the organization which could result in losing the business to competitors.Moving on to collaborate, also known as clan culture is to descr ibe the organization as a whole team. By coming together as a team to tackle problems, problems can be solved quickly. However, this would impede business progress by having the same point of views. There are no second or third opinions involved as the members would have the similar mindset and way of thinking. Therefore, the members would agree on the decision without thinking much from a different perspective or comparing opinions.One of the last culture that impede business progress is create/adhocracy culture. Being flexible and innovative is also important in assuring the organizations and business success, as well as being ahead of others. Creativity is also a part of the adhocracy culture. However, the strong culture of sharing the same values and beliefs would prove difficult for members to come up with fresh and innovative ideas. In addition to strong culture, members of the organization are not able to adapt and troubleshoot complex problems. In the end, strong culture imp edes the progression of business.ConclusionLeadership is an essential value for managerial person, no matter in which knowledge base the person in. Therefore, one must do his best on put a good example to the followers and trust their ability to jazz their work, so the followers will be inspired and always give their best towards the leader or the organization. Even though that theory can understand and memorize easily, one must still put some effort on practicing on it as it cannot be obtained easily interchangeable a technical skills.Furthermore, when a person has leadership lies within himself, the followers will believe and respect the decision made by the leader, and frankincense perform the work efficiently and effectively. In conclusion, the organization will be benefit and the employees will do their best all the time.