Hurt people Essay Example for Free

Hurt people EssayIn this piece, the work of Dr. Sandra Wilson (2001) de get going be looked at from the perspective of obtaining a comprehensive psycheal surmise of counseling. Wilson draws on many a(prenominal) years of counseling experience and has developed a simple yet profound judgment that pine people, hurt people. In this speculation, Wilson describes how a person is wounded early on in invigoration and how those hurts translates into a continual wounded adult feel if not properly addressed. The paper will conk out a brief summary of the Wilsons hypothesis, even out out some strengths that this system presents along with weaknesses. Lastly, this paper will draw on personal experience from the author that connects with the content of Wilsons supposition and patch ups distract applications for further counseling practice. ? WILSON CRITIQUE 3 Introduction Dr. Sandra Wilson (2001) presents a very helpful and unique theory for the Christian counselor in her bo ok, Hurt People Hurt People. This theory critique paper will introduce, unlike different theories that hurt been discussed, the crucial role that laic systems play in the development of a persons health, illness, and personality (Slide Presentation, COUN 507 B08 LUO, Week 1, Slide 2).Wilson (2001) argues that hurts and wounds that originate in childhood are the first-string driving force for why a person hurts other people later on in adulthood. Summary Wilson (2001) begins her theory on why hurt people hurt people by conveyance that a persons childhood, no matter how good or loving it was, experiences some sign or level of hurt (Wilson, 2001). This exploration into the childhood stage of a persons life shows that the messages a child receives during that stage butt determine the trends of ones actions in adulthood (Wilson 2001).In essence the sum of an adults hurtful actions can be explained by the choices that the child do in response to the hurtful environment in which t hey lived (Wilson, 2001, pg. 86). This cornerstone concept stems out of Wilsons (2001) theory of why hurt people hurt people. Wilson (2001) describes three questions that children must not only answer but by which their answers lead to the choices they make in life. First a child is asking, Can I be safe in the environment I am in and the predominate relationships around me? Children will make choices in their daily lives to manage how to obtain a sense of stability and meet basic ask (Wilson, 2001, pg. 74). Next, children ask the question, Can I convey and show my true self to WILSON CRITIQUE 4 those around me? (Wilson, 2001, pg. 75). This boils down to the childs identity and desire to know if their needs and emotions are able to be met through the expression of their true nature. Lastly, children ask, Can I be trustworthy in a relationally by those around me? In this question, children learn to accept themselves or not by the quality of the how their parents accept or dont accept them for who they are. Wilson (2001) concludes that what is uniquely powerful in this dynamic is that children believe they are freely making their choices when in fact they have very little option in the process (Wilson, 2001, pg. 82). Wilson (2001) finds that where a child questions has dramatic and adult-changing effect due to a perception we have about graven image. Wilson states that children from a full general sense pretend of God as an blown-up parent?This perception of God as an exaggerated parent explains how the choices that children make based on the above stated questions that children ask have an effect in adult life. So for example, if a child is raised in a stable home and feels loved, accepted and able to be themselves, they will generally view God as someone who has the same inclination. Weaknesses and Strengths Wilson (2001) presents many strengths in her theory of hurt people, hurt people. One of the strengths is her ability to communicate the motivati on for why individuals transport in hurtful ways to one another.She relates that the messages that children receive from their parents in good and bad instances are consequently acted upon to protect and defend safety, stability, and their sense of image. These choices which continue on into adulthood come out in an foaming way of WILSON CRITIQUE 5 relating to one other (Wilson, 2001). Wilsons approach is centered on the past(a) of the individual where a majority of these choices have their beginning. Another strength of Wilson is her ability to define the role of temporal systems in the development of personality.She makes a case that what we live through and how we change as result of the environment ultimately determines what we become, which can have positive or disallow consequences (Wilson, 2001, pg. 86). Wilson creates a helpful map for arrangement from a general perspective how someone might change from the temporal systems in which they live. By describing this busy map, Wilson helps the counselor and/or counselee trace their steps book binding to understand the origins of the choices made.At the end of the map, Wilson purposes that the family system, the schools system, or other cultural systems are potential reasons for what motivates hurtful behavior. One weakness to point out from Wilsons theory is the fact she focus predominately on the past. Wilson does not look into other explanations for motivation other than centering her theory around the parents effect on the child. Though she does talk on a hardly a(prenominal) points about the Lords role in how a person goes about changing in to a healthy adult, the majority of Wilsons synthesis for why someone may hurt others or take a defensive stance toward another person centers less on scriptural principles and more on her year of experience in the counseling field.Though this cant be considered a true hard and fast weakness, I would have expected her to undergird this prominent part of pro cess with scriptural references. WILSON CRITIQUE 6 Personal Reflection I agree with Wilsons theory of why hurt people hurt people, mainly because I personally relate.When I read her theory, and think of my own personal childhood, I can very much see where some of my own behaviors have come out of thoughts and choices I made to protect my own feelings and acceptance. As I look back at my own past relations with my dad and how that has dramatically effected me in some negative areas, I recall the main challenge that Wilson describes we have to face and overcome is our distorted view of God (Wilson, 2001, pg. 188). As I have thought through what my dad has communicated to me about who God is, I crystalise more and more how much more of a journey I have in knowledgeable God truly.It would seem that one of the greatest tasks that we as counselors have is the stewardship of the integrity of revealing who God is. If what Wilson has set forth is on point, and I think it is, then how we as counselors accurately and efficaciously communicate the truth of the person of God to hurting people is paramount to the transformation. One method that Wilson described in her book for help counselees is how introducing new choices and consistently enacting those choices can produce change?Through the counseling process, I would want to send what was the pathway or map for the distorted view of God and how that distorted view has shaped the actions of the person. I would then introduce the simple truth of what the counselee doesnt know into the the realm of the known. Wilson makes a great point that the counselee wont know they can change until they know what they have chosen (Wilson, 2001, pg. 88). I think this can be a powerful tool in the tool belt of counseling because it is the power truth that will ultimately set the person free to heal from the wounds that they are experiencing.